What each one matches
the text of what was said
Matches the content of messages. This is the slowest and most restricted of the four, and the
one people misjudge most often — see the three-month limit below.
the thread, by who it is with
Matches the conversation’s own display number, and the contact’s name, email address, phone number
or external identifier. It does not look inside the messages — that is what the messages
results are for.
the person, not the thread
Matches name, email, phone number or identifier, across the whole account — but only among
contacts that have a non-empty email, phone number or identifier. A name-only contact, such as an
unidentified web visitor, never appears here, no matter how you type the name.
your whole help centre, any status
Matches help centre articles with no status scope — a draft or an archived article
is just as searchable here as a published one. Worth remembering as a reason to be careful what
you leave sitting in draft: it’s findable long before it’s meant to be customer-facing.
The two limits
You see results from the inboxes you have access to. Conversation and message results are
scoped to your own inboxes; administrators see every inbox in the account. Contacts and articles
are account-wide for everyone.
Getting a better result
- Search by phone number or email rather than name. Names are entered inconsistently by customers and imported inconsistently by systems; a phone number is a phone number.
- If you know roughly when, use a view instead. Filters beat search for “everything from this inbox, last week, still open” — search is for when you know what, not when.
- Quote the exact phrase you remember. Message search matches the content you type; a half-remembered paraphrase will not find it.
Next
Conversation views
Filters and saved views — better than search for anything time-shaped.
Working together
Participants, mentions, private notes and snooze.
Labels
The thing that makes conversations findable a year later.
Contacts
Searching people rather than threads.